
When it comes to
treatment options and decisions, a woman does not just have "breast
cancer." She has a disease that is much more specific and involves:
the stage of the cancer (is it in the breast only or has it spread to regional
lymph nodes or elsewhere in the body?); the type (what are the estrogen-receptor
and progesterone-receptor levels in the tumor tissue?); her age, overall
health, and menopausal; and, finally, whether the cancer has just been diagnosed
or is a recurrence.
Because doctors can now pinpoint so many of these details
about breast cancer, there have been three general treatment advances. First,
doctors have been able to reduce the use of radical mastectomy. Second, doctors
and patients accept that there is no longer a need to rush into treatment.
And, third, there have been major improvements in "adjuvant" or post-operative
therapies.
"Today we know that from a survival perspective, a lumpectomy
with radiation equals a radical mastectomy for most patients," explains Lillie
Shockney, RN, BS, MAS, Administrative Director of Breast Center and Instructor
in the Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
in Baltimore, Maryland and a 14-year breast cancer survivor. "One exception,
for example, is someone with inflammatory breast cancer, which comprises
2% of patients."

Because of the knowledge that most breast cancers are slow-growing,
"women should not have their hair on fire," when they receive a diagnosis,
Shockney continues. "They have time to fact-find and make good, informed
decisions. In fact, generally, if someone tells them to have surgery next
week, they should leave the office."
Knowing and understanding the good news
about breast cancer treatment means that once a woman begins to manage her
feelings after diagnosis, she has some time
to research and make a decision based on medical information and her own
good judgment.
Another
big change is that patients are no longer treated by one doctor but by a
group of physicians called "the
treatment team." This team often includes a breast surgeon (often the
same person who performed the biopsy), a radiation oncologist, and a medical
oncologist. The radiation oncologist is a specialist who treats cancer with
radiation. The medical oncologist focuses on treating cancer with chemotherapy,
hormonal therapies, and drugs such as Herceptin. Everyone on the team–and
the patient, as well as her loved ones–should have all the information
that the diagnostic team knows before taking any treatment steps. In other
words, the team does not make decisions about chemotherapy and radiation
after surgery. Instead, all decisions–the course of treatment–are
designed before anything happens. And patients have a full understanding
of the treatment plan before moving forward.
Here are other advances in the
treatment of breast cancer, including surgeries, chemotherapy, radiation,
and hormone therapy or biologics that breast cancer patients should know
about:
About 70% of patients with breast cancer now get routine
axillary lymph node dissection with a lumpectomy rather than having a radical
mastectomy. The axillary lymph nodes are located in the under arm and are
directly related to breast health. In the past, some (if not all) axillary
lymph nodes were removed even before shown to be cancerous. This approach
made for a rough recovery and left about 30% of patients with pain and reduced
mobility.
"These days, however, an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection
is sentinel lymph node dissection, which is less invasive," says Harry
D. Bear, M.D., Ph.D., a surgical oncologist and head of the Breast Health
Center at Massey Cancer Center.
Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond.
"There is good and bad news with sentinel node mapping," continues Bear.
The good news is that it can improve a woman's recovery. "But doctors may
find something that leads them to the lymph node removal, which may change
the type of radiation and chemotherapy a woman receives in the long run."
"When we do sentinel node mapping, it's hard to argue that women get out
of the hospital faster and they move their arm faster," says Joan Mortimer,
M.D., Deputy Director for Clinical Oncology at Moores UCSD Cancer Center
and professor of medicine in the UCSD School of Medicine. "The downside is
that we take the sentinel lymph node and we're not sure this is valuable."
The sentinel node is the first node that drains the breast into the axilla,
which can affect the type of surgery than can be done at a later date if
a more problematic cancer is found or if the cancer recurs.
In sentinel node mapping, "we find more microscopic cancer and put
stains on it," Mortimer explains. "We find cells that could
be breast cancer we never would have seen these cells in the past."
While little has changed in terms of chemo delivery systems,
the scheduling of chemotherapy has evolved in recent years, says Harold Burstein,
M.D., Ph.D., a clinician and clinical investigator in the Breast Oncology
Center at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.
Delivery scheduling
is important in chemotherapy because of what chemo drugs do. They fight cancer
cells by interfering with the process of rapidly dividing cells. But because
cancer cells aren't the only rapidly dividing cells in the body, there are
harsh side effects as the body responds to this intrusion to its natural
rhythm. To combat the side effects, doctors give chemotherapy in cycles,
with each treatment period followed by a brief recovery period. Those cycles
were usually spaced three weeks apart to allow the body to recuperate, but
this down time also allowed cancer cells to begin to re-multiply.
A recent
study found that giving chemotherapy every two weeks works better than giving
it every three weeks, even though this dose is more intense. This plan attacks
the cancer cells before they begin to multiply again, which has been shown
to be an effective approach.
Researchers have also learned that women who
have estrogen receptive negative cancer do better with chemo than other breast
cancer patients. And although it hasn't happened yet, some physicians expect
that the national guidelines for chemotherapy will change shortly. One day,
chemotherapy might be used primarily for the 30% of the breast cancer survivors
whose breast cancer is not fueled by estrogen.
The biggest thing that's come along in radiation is the "accelerated
partial breast radiation for early stage disease," says Douglas W.
Arthur, M.D., radiation oncologist also at the Breast Health Center at the
Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University. Previously, the standard
of care was to have whole-breast radiation over six weeks, which created
several logistical challenges. Women had trouble taking six weeks off from
work (and their lives) to receive radiation. Also, not all women lived close
enough to a treatment center to actually get the radiation for such an extended
period. As a result, some women who were supposed to get radiation would
simply skip it.
Doctors have found that, for some women, a lumpectomy with
radiation two times a day for five days is more realistic - and equally effective
- than a six-week program.
Along with chemotherapy, hormone and biological
therapy medications fall under a category called "adjuvant treatment." Unlike
surgery and radiation, these treatments target microscopic cancer cells that
have spread from the primary cancer in the breast, explains Peter A. Kaufman,
M.D., of Norris Cotton Cancer Center; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
in New Hampshire.
"Herceptin is the most recent major advance women have
at their disposal these days," Kaufman says. "A number of years ago, a gene
that helped control how cancer cells grown, divide, and repair themselves
was found. It is known as HER2 (also called HER2/neu or human epidermal growth
factor receptor 2). It's an oncogene that induces cancer genes to
behave more aggressively and allows a cancer to metastasize more readily."
Now
physicians know that if a woman has a breast cancer with increased levels
of this gene, she is likely to have a more negative overall prognosis. Fortunately,
Herceptin is an antibody that recognizes and attacks this specific gene and,
when combined with conventional treatments such as chemotherapy, is extremely
effective. In a recent study evaluating Herceptin in women with early stage
breast cancer, "we have seen a 50% reduction in the risk of recurrence
at an early time point, which is quite dramatic," Kaufman continues.
Another
promising treatment is a new class of medicines called aromatase inhibitors,
which lower the amount of estrogen in post-menopausal women who have hormone-receptor-positive
breast cancer. These medications stop aromatase (an enzyme) from turning
androgen into estrogen, which lowers the amount of estrogen in the bloodstream.
Some of these medicines are Arimidex (anastrozole), Aromasin (exemestane),
and Femara (letrozole) and are not being prescribed in place of tamoxifen,
which can have distressing side effects.
No matter
what the stage, the goal of all breast cancer treatment is two-fold: to prevent
the cancer from spreading and to prevent its recurrence. That means the early
stages of cancer are truly curable and when it comes to Stage IV cancer,
"we've changed its history," Kaufman says. "It's not curable, but it can
be effectively treated and we can put it in remission. We have changed it
into a chronic illness, so it's treatable but not curable." And those are
truly stunning achievements for the treatment revolutions in breast cancer.
Imagine where we'll be in just a few more years.

|